<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vancouver Blogs</title>
	<link>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/</link>
	<description>Now With 100% More Rant!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Lyndsayaq</title>
		<link>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-30583</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-30583</guid>
					<description>well done, bro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done, bro
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Vancouver real estate</title>
		<link>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-17289</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-17289</guid>
					<description>I think it is not really the quality of these blogs that matters. It is the fact that they EXIST. Blogging is not an ancient form of communication, it is still under development. So are all the Vancouver-related weblogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is not really the quality of these blogs that matters. It is the fact that they EXIST. Blogging is not an ancient form of communication, it is still under development. So are all the Vancouver-related weblogs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: darren</title>
		<link>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-13640</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-13640</guid>
					<description>I hear you about a lack of interesting blogs, Gary.

I've created a blog about something I'm very passionate about - customer service experiences...from great to horrible...regardless of location or type of business.  

I am a big believer in word-of-mouth advertising (positive or negative) and in Vancouver especially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you about a lack of interesting blogs, Gary.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve created a blog about something I&#8217;m very passionate about - customer service experiences&#8230;from great to horrible&#8230;regardless of location or type of business.  </p>
<p>I am a big believer in word-of-mouth advertising (positive or negative) and in Vancouver especially.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SlaveToShopping</title>
		<link>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-3956</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 08:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-3956</guid>
					<description>You forgot the hurting http://www.overheardinvancouver.ca/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot the hurting <a href='http://www.overheardinvancouver.ca/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.overheardinvancouver.ca/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dirk</title>
		<link>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-3357</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-3357</guid>
					<description>Well folks that going to change soon.I am in the process of building a new blog devoted to all things BC.
And also have a blog in the works with a fellow Vancouver blogger of some note.Which promises to be interesting..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well folks that going to change soon.I am in the process of building a new blog devoted to all things BC.<br />
And also have a blog in the works with a fellow Vancouver blogger of some note.Which promises to be interesting..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gary Condit</title>
		<link>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-2863</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-2863</guid>
					<description>GC here. A couple of things to clarify, re: my rant.

First, this rant was originally written as a comment in response to a post on Metroblogging Vancouver.

Therefore, when I say 'as for this site', I'm referring to Metroblogging Vancouver, not Rant! Vancouver. (Which also sucks, though - it's so bad, I don't even read it.)

Second, I'm no troll. I'm just a reader of Vancouver websites who would like to see more interesting content published on my hometown blogs.

Third, my criticism that blogs are written by 'nice' people shouldn't be overcompensated for by writers turning themselves into assholes.

I want you to be interesting, and funny, before being mean. 

It's a fine line to walk, but if you're a writer worth your salt, then you can do it.

And finally, I also hate artsy writers who try to hard. No 'whirling dervishes' or excessive use of adjectives, thank you. Vancouver has enough of these hacks trying to write books, for God's sake.

Keeping it real - Gary Condit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GC here. A couple of things to clarify, re: my rant.</p>
<p>First, this rant was originally written as a comment in response to a post on Metroblogging Vancouver.</p>
<p>Therefore, when I say &#8216;as for this site&#8217;, I&#8217;m referring to Metroblogging Vancouver, not Rant! Vancouver. (Which also sucks, though - it&#8217;s so bad, I don&#8217;t even read it.)</p>
<p>Second, I&#8217;m no troll. I&#8217;m just a reader of Vancouver websites who would like to see more interesting content published on my hometown blogs.</p>
<p>Third, my criticism that blogs are written by &#8216;nice&#8217; people shouldn&#8217;t be overcompensated for by writers turning themselves into assholes.</p>
<p>I want you to be interesting, and funny, before being mean. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a fine line to walk, but if you&#8217;re a writer worth your salt, then you can do it.</p>
<p>And finally, I also hate artsy writers who try to hard. No &#8216;whirling dervishes&#8217; or excessive use of adjectives, thank you. Vancouver has enough of these hacks trying to write books, for God&#8217;s sake.</p>
<p>Keeping it real - Gary Condit
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rant!Vancouver</title>
		<link>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-2648</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 06:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-2648</guid>
					<description>Bring it on Ray!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring it on Ray!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-2647</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 06:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-2647</guid>
					<description>"old dude" here - and that's
'Oldest Living Blogger' to you,
Kiddies. And why are there only two replies above? Are we three the only readers on here? Is this why the content is so bland? Shame on us!
Maybe I should cut loose with
some of the caustic comment I
used to send to the Vancouver Sun's editorial flunkies to keep them tuned up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;old dude&#8221; here - and that&#8217;s<br />
&#8216;Oldest Living Blogger&#8217; to you,<br />
Kiddies. And why are there only two replies above? Are we three the only readers on here? Is this why the content is so bland? Shame on us!<br />
Maybe I should cut loose with<br />
some of the caustic comment I<br />
used to send to the Vancouver Sun&#8217;s editorial flunkies to keep them tuned up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-2631</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-2631</guid>
					<description>I'd put Metroblogging Vancouver http://vancouver.metblogs.com/ in the top three, and not Urban Vancouver (for which I'm a managing editor).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d put Metroblogging Vancouver <a href='http://vancouver.metblogs.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://vancouver.metblogs.com/</a> in the top three, and not Urban Vancouver (for which I&#8217;m a managing editor).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-2630</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rantvancouver.com/2007/02/09/vancouver-blogs/#comment-2630</guid>
					<description>I'd love to see a blog that covers the great events and news that don't make it to the mainstream media outlets and agree with you, Gary, there's not too much out there.  I suppose that might be a function of there not being too much motivation for someone to really dig into the underground scene...too bad.

PS Am also suitably embarassed for not only ~using~ the word snarky, but incorporating it into the title of my blog, thus forever associating myself with middle-aged suburbanites when I am, in fact, a twenty-something urbanite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see a blog that covers the great events and news that don&#8217;t make it to the mainstream media outlets and agree with you, Gary, there&#8217;s not too much out there.  I suppose that might be a function of there not being too much motivation for someone to really dig into the underground scene&#8230;too bad.</p>
<p>PS Am also suitably embarassed for not only ~using~ the word snarky, but incorporating it into the title of my blog, thus forever associating myself with middle-aged suburbanites when I am, in fact, a twenty-something urbanite.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
